This is an archival version of the original KnowledgePoint website.

Interactive features have been disabled and some pages and links have been removed.

Visit the new KnowledgePoint website at https://www.knowledgepoint.org.

 

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version
RedR TSS gravatar image
RedR TSS

Like Nick, my initial thought was also why H2S? Though I have come across wells that stank of rotting eggs, I understood that it was harmless in itself, just unpleasant to drink, and anyway it would all evaporate off after a few hours if the water was left standing.

I then Googled it and came across details of a test kit that used H2S as an indicator of faecal pollution - https://www.etc.murdoch.edu.au/pages/h2s.html And I guess that this is what is required rather than a test for H2S itself.

More information from the website is as follows;

A simple, easy to use water testing kit, developed for aboriginal communities.

Safe drinking water is one of the primary requirements for healthy life. Epidemics arising from waterborne diseases are a global health problem. About eighty percent of all infectious diseases throughout the world are water related. Microbial pollution of drinking water is due to the presence of faecal matter in the water supply. It is impossible to test water for each and every microorganism of faecal origin. Water is therefore tested for suitable microbial indicators such as coliform bacteria which is present in the faecal matter of warm blooded animals including humans. Coliform bacteria have been generally accepted as the indicators of faecal pollution. Another organism present in faecal matter is sulphate reducing bacteria that have been found to occur in high numbers of up to a thousand million organisms per mg of human faeces, which is almost the same as coliform bacteria and hence shall be considered as an indicator.

A method to test this was refined and modified... based on the detection of H2S reducing bacteria originally developed by Manja et al (1982). A test kit to test the bacteriological quality of water had been developed to conduct the test on-site. This is very suitable for the remote communities... The test kit is now being introduced to Aboriginal Communities. The test is very simple and does not require technically trained personnel to conduct the test. As part of the kit, RADG has produced a video and training book, which are self-explanatory. It is economical compared to all other tests in terms of cost of chemicals, transportation, and storage. As there is no need for incubation at a constant temperature, the kit uses a cheap yoghurt maker as the incubator to heat up to 35 degrees Celsius. The method works best at 35 degrees even though it will work between 18 and 40 degrees Celsius. The medium has indefinite shelf life and does not need to be stored in a refrigerator, unlike other chemicals. The kit will have great application in developing countries and has the potential to be an internationally appropriate technology.

I hope that this helps.

If you do actually need to test for H2S in itself there are a range of companies on line advertising test kits. This can be as simple as strips to dip in the water. How these relate to the test kit described above I do not know, presumably it has to detect trace levels to work as an indicator of faecal pollution.

click to hide/show revision 2
No.2 Revision

Like Nick, my initial thought was also why H2S? Though I have come across wells that stank of rotting eggs, I understood that it was harmless in itself, just unpleasant to drink, and anyway it would all evaporate off after a few hours if the water was left standing.

I then Googled it and came across details of a test kit that used H2S as an indicator of faecal pollution - https://www.etc.murdoch.edu.au/pages/h2s.html And I guess that this is what is required rather than a test for H2S itself.

More information from the website is as follows;

A simple, easy to use water testing kit, developed for aboriginal communities.

Safe drinking water is one of the primary requirements for healthy life. Epidemics arising from waterborne diseases are a global health problem. About eighty percent of all infectious diseases throughout the world are water related. Microbial pollution of drinking water is due to the presence of faecal matter in the water supply. It is impossible to test water for each and every microorganism of faecal origin. Water is therefore tested for suitable microbial indicators such as coliform bacteria which is present in the faecal matter of warm blooded animals including humans. Coliform bacteria have been generally accepted as the indicators of faecal pollution. Another organism present in faecal matter is sulphate reducing bacteria that have been found to occur in high numbers of up to a thousand million organisms per mg of human faeces, which is almost the same as coliform bacteria and hence shall be considered as an indicator.

A method to test this was refined and modified... based on the detection of H2S reducing bacteria originally developed by Manja et al (1982). A test kit to test the bacteriological quality of water had been developed to conduct the test on-site. This is very suitable for the remote communities... The test kit is now being introduced to Aboriginal Communities. The test is very simple and does not require technically trained personnel to conduct the test. As part of the kit, RADG has produced a video and training book, which are self-explanatory. It is economical compared to all other tests in terms of cost of chemicals, transportation, and storage. As there is no need for incubation at a constant temperature, the kit uses a cheap yoghurt maker as the incubator to heat up to 35 degrees Celsius. The method works best at 35 degrees even though it will work between 18 and 40 degrees Celsius. The medium has indefinite shelf life and does not need to be stored in a refrigerator, unlike other chemicals. The kit will have great application in developing countries and has the potential to be an internationally appropriate technology.

I hope that this helps.

If you do actually need to test for H2S in itself there are a range of companies on line advertising test kits. This can be as simple as strips to dip in the water. How these relate to the test kit described above I do not know, presumably it has to detect trace levels to work as an indicator of faecal pollution.

pollution. Regards, Martin Ager

click to hide/show revision 3
No.3 Revision

Like Nick, my initial thought was also why H2S? Though I have come across wells that stank of rotting eggs, I understood that it was harmless in itself, just unpleasant to drink, and anyway it would all evaporate off after a few hours if the water was left standing.

I then Googled it and came across details of a test kit that used H2S as an indicator of faecal pollution - https://www.etc.murdoch.edu.au/pages/h2s.html And I guess that this is what is required rather than a test for H2S itself.

More information from the website is as follows;

A simple, easy to use water testing kit, developed for aboriginal communities.

Safe drinking water is one of the primary requirements for healthy life. Epidemics arising from waterborne diseases are a global health problem. About eighty percent of all infectious diseases throughout the world are water related. Microbial pollution of drinking water is due to the presence of faecal matter in the water supply. It is impossible to test water for each and every microorganism of faecal origin. Water is therefore tested for suitable microbial indicators such as coliform bacteria which is present in the faecal matter of warm blooded animals including humans. Coliform bacteria have been generally accepted as the indicators of faecal pollution. Another organism present in faecal matter is sulphate reducing bacteria that have been found to occur in high numbers of up to a thousand million organisms per mg of human faeces, which is almost the same as coliform bacteria and hence shall be considered as an indicator.

A method to test this was refined and modified... based on the detection of H2S reducing bacteria originally developed by Manja et al (1982). A test kit to test the bacteriological quality of water had been developed to conduct the test on-site. This is very suitable for the remote communities... The test kit is now being introduced to Aboriginal Communities. The test is very simple and does not require technically trained personnel to conduct the test. As part of the kit, RADG has produced a video and training book, which are self-explanatory. It is economical compared to all other tests in terms of cost of chemicals, transportation, and storage. As there is no need for incubation at a constant temperature, the kit uses a cheap yoghurt maker as the incubator to heat up to 35 degrees Celsius. The method works best at 35 degrees even though it will work between 18 and 40 degrees Celsius. The medium has indefinite shelf life and does not need to be stored in a refrigerator, unlike other chemicals. The kit will have great application in developing countries and has the potential to be an internationally appropriate technology.

I hope that this helps.

If you do actually need to test for H2S in itself there are a range of companies on line advertising test kits. This can be as simple as strips to dip in the water. How these relate to the test kit described above I do not know, presumably it has to detect trace levels to work as an indicator of faecal pollution. Regards, Martin Ager

Martin