This is an archival version of the original KnowledgePoint website.

Interactive features have been disabled and some pages and links have been removed.

Visit the new KnowledgePoint website at https://www.knowledgepoint.org.

 
0

What are the disadvantages and failings of UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) wastewater treatment system?

Neil Noble
Energy
KnowledgePointAdmin
RedR CCDRR

What are the disadvantages and failings of UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) wastewater treatment system?


2 Answers

0
RedR TSS
RedR TSS

It would be useful to know a bit about what part of the world you are making enquiries for as the UASB has been particularly effective in tropical locations where temperatures are warmer and relatively stable.

In general the greatest risk with a UASB is the possibility of washout of the biomass if the HRT (hydraulic retention time) is too low. To maintain the population of useful microorganisms and anaerobes a larger reactor volume or HRT may be required which can lead to higher capital costs.

The UASB has a long start up time and recovery from stressed conditions can also take many days, making control of the reactor important. In particular control of factors that will affect operation such as temperature, pH and influx of any toxic substances in the feed stream. Operation of the UASB requires trained and experienced operators. Typically it has been used for industrial wastewater treatment and seen as less effective on dilute municipal feeds but more recent design improvements have seen the use of UASB in municipal sewage treatment in countries such as Brazil.

The following paper gives quite a good review of the UASB: Bal AS, Dhagat NN (April 2001). "Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor—a review". Indian J Environ Health 43 (2): 1–82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12397675

Regards Harriette

0
RedR TSS
RedR TSS

I was recently working on a project as expert witness, centred on a UASB followed by Activated Sludge in the Middle East treating sewage from a sewer system. The idea was that the UASB would remove about 70% of the BOD load at a lower opex than activated sludge. Unfortunately what the designers overlooked was sea water intrusion into the sewers. The resulting high sulphate generated hydrogen sulphide in the UASB which then overloaded the downstream AS. I would be happy to discuss your interest in UASB further if you could give more information about the context in which you are considering it. Regards Richard